About Me

Name: L Gravel
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Logical Consequence

Forbes/AP reports:

A man has sued his former employer, saying it violated his privacy and civil rights when it fired him because he smokes cigarettes.

The Scotts Co., a subsidiary of Scotts-Miracle Gro Co. of Marysville, Ohio, instituted a policy early this year forbidding smoking to promote healthful lifestyles and hold down insurance costs. In the 20 states that allow such policies - including Massachusetts - the company refuses to hire smokers and tests all new employees for nicotine, said Jim King, Scotts' vice president for corporate communications and investor relations.

King refused to comment specifically on Rodrigues' case because he said the company's lawyers hadn't reviewed it, but said all new employees are told they must be tobacco-free and are told they will be tested for nicotine.

"It's on our Web site. It's on our terms of employment when they are hired," King said. "We make it very clear to people what the expectation is related to tobacco use."

On the one hand, it's ridiculous that a company would be this invasive.  However, this is the logical consequence of our health care "system" that expects companies to provide people with health insurance.

Let's review.  Here are the kinds of benefits employees may receive on a pre-tax basis from their company:
health plan
dental plan
retirement plan

And here are the kinds of benefits employees do not receive on a pre-tax basis:
life insurance
transportation plan
housing plan
food plan
clothing plan
entertainment plan

For this latter group, the company simply gives its employees a voucher-like instrument called "money."  Employees then take the "money" and redeem it for all these things.

And the rhyme or reason for why a particular item might fall in the first group or the second?  Good luck figuring that out.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Crude, Gas

From the Colorado Springs Gazette/AP:

About half the oil and more than a quarter of the natural gas beneath 99 million acres of federal land is off-limits to drilling, the Bush administration says in a report that industry sought to highlight environmental and other hurdles to development.

Just 3 percent of the oil and 13 percent of the gas under federal land is accessible under standard lease terms that require only basic protections for the environment and cultural resources, according to the survey, which was ordered last year by Congress.

An additional 46 percent of the oil and 60 percent of the gas "may be developed subject to additional restrictions" such as bans to protect winter rangeland for foraging antelope, nesting areas for bald eagles and jagged slopes from erosion during parts of the year.

Can we drill now?  Or shall we keep buying this stuff from the Iranians?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tilting at Windmills

From FoxNews/AP, we get this important story:

The Rev. Jesse Jackson and others said they will meet with TV networks, film companies and musicians to discuss the "n-word."

Asked about free-speech issues, Jackson said the word is "unprotected."

U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., charged that only situations such as the Richards incident turn mainstream media attention to issues involving the black community.

"This is not simply about whether or not the black community forgives or forgets, this is about understanding that this is pervasive, that this happens in all of our institutions, one way or the other," Waters said.

No surprise here -- this is how the racial profiteers make their profit, by waging war on symbols.  Inanities abound, of course.  If the n-word were successfully stricken from the nation's vocabulary and stuffed in the garbage can alongside the rebel flag, it wouldn't provide one job for a black person, much less put one dollar in his/her pocket.  Maxine Waters, as usual, smears everyone with her comment.  And the TV networks?  Which episode of Desperate Housewives does Rev. Jackson want to discuss?

Over the decades, our society has given tremendous power to... the word.  We have built it up as that great, nuclear thing that lurks out there; so awesome, so terrible, that no one can even dare utter it.

I say let's go the other way -- let's drag it out into the open and drain it of its power.  The way black comedians have been doing for years.  The way Mel Brooks did with Blazing Saddles.  Treat not the word as if it's sacred; rather, throw it around like something common, like "pale" or "freckled" or "telephone."

Tear the word out by its roots.  I'm no linguist, but the word sounds to be a slang pronunciation of the word "negro," as in "United Negro College Fund."  And negro is Spanish for "black."  Let slip all the baggage.  It serves no one, save the profiteers.

Jackson & Co. claim they want a utopia in which the word is never spoken.  Here is a competing vision: a world in which a white guy says, "hey, (n-word), what's going on tonight?"  And a black guy responds, "not much, snowflake; want to go to the ball game?"  Be offended if you wish, but in which world do we find the races fully reconciled?

True, some words need to retain their power, their history and their full meaning, such as slavery, lynching, holocaust, genocide and torture.  But the n-word is not among them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feel POWERFUL!

The December 2006 issue of Colorado Nurse arrived in the mail.  It appears to be a publication of the Colorado Nurses Association (a union).  On page 4, there is the following advertisement:

CNA
COLORADO NURSES ASSOCIATION
Government Affairs & Public Policy
(GAPP) Committee Wants YOU!

(picture of Uncle Sam pointing a finger)

Colorado Nurses Association is looking for participants to help
drive legislative change in many areas!

THE OPPORTUNITIES:
Change lives on a large scale!
Impact nursing in a way you never thought possible!
Experience how governments REALLY CAN work for you!
Feel like you have really made a difference!
Utilize YOUR area of expertise!

THE FLEXIBLE WAYS TO PARTICIPATE:
Bring your special interest to the table and discuss the areas of needed change!
Including but NOT limited to:
Hospital Nursing          Advanced Practice Nursing          Ambulatory Care
Midwifery                         Nursing Education                         Peri-operative

PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
Attend monthly Wednesday meetings at the CNA office Denver 6-8pm!
Attend the meetings by conference call!
Research issues and report over email!
Testify in Legislative Committees for or against bills!
Inform you State Senators and Reps!
Organize nurses to contribute to change at the government level!
Learn to Propose Bills!  Follow Bills!  Analyze Bills!
Propose a way to participate that works for you!

THE IMPACT YOU CAN HAVE:
Change the lives of Nurses around the state!  Change the lives of Patients!
Raise taxes!  (ok, I added that one; couldn't resist -- Loose Gravelarian)

WHAT IS THE PAYOFF FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION?
Experience feeling POWERFUL!
Express your leadership skills!

(contact info)

First of all, this is a prime example of why one shouldn't write ad copy on seven cups of coffee!  I mean really!  How many exclamation points can one use?!  Hello!  I'm picturing Crazy Larry the car salesman shouting at me from my television!  Right now!  No kidding!

I've been in the computer field my whole life.  And I confess we're by and large an unregulated bunch of cowboys.  If I were to tell the other members of my profession I was going to the state government in order to change their lives, eventually someone would find my body in a dumpster behind Office Depot with a keyboard sticking out of me.

"Bring your special interests"?  Well, at least they admit it...

"Experience feeling POWERFUL!"  Yes, that makes me sleep like a baby at night -- the idea that a bunch of nurses who don't feel powerful enough when they're sticking me with hypodermic needles are going to go to the state legislature and join forces with the mighty hand of government.  Be afraid; be very afraid.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ugh

I like old movies.  But not all.  We're now the proud owners of White Christmas with Bing Crosby and Danny Kaye on DVD.  Watching it is like eating a cup of sugar with syrup poured over it.

And of course, my family loves it; so I'm sure we'll be watching it on a regular basis.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rwanda, Episode IV

The American Enterprise magazine has been relaunched as The American.  In the inaugural edition, we find a resurgence going on in Rwanda:

But today, for those in the know, Rwanda is hot. After fighting two wars in neighboring Congo, resettling more than a million refugees, and designing a system of justice for several hundred thousand imprisoned genocide suspects, Rwanda’s leaders are now turning their energy to making the country hospitable to business. Rwanda’s president, Paul Kagame, a charismatic former guerrilla leader who earned a diploma in business studies by correspondence after he took office (his exams were proctored by the British ambassador), has a vision of Rwanda as a service economy integrated into the global marketplace through information technology—a sort of Dubai in the highlands of Central Africa.

A little good news to facilitate the giving of thanks.

Happy Thanksgiving.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God Save the Queen

I try to be upbeat.  Really I do.  But some days you just can't fight it.

FoxNews/AP reports that Americans continue to turn away from marriage:

Out-of-wedlock births in the United States have climbed to an all-time high, accounting for nearly four in 10 babies born last year, government health officials said Tuesday.

The overall rise reflects the burgeoning number of people who are putting off marriage or living together without getting married.

[A]bout 20 percent of all new mothers under 20 were unmarried but living with the father at the time of the birth. That same was true of about 13 percent of all new mothers ages 20 to 24.

According to census figures, the median age at first marriage was 27 for men and 25 for women last year, up from 23 and 20 in 1950. Meanwhile, the number of unmarried-couple households with children has been climbing, hitting more than 1.7 million last year, up from under 200,000 in 1970.

So while the West crumbles, this news arrives via the Washington Times:

Low domestic birthrates and rising immigration from the former Soviet republics are producing explosive growth in Russia's Muslim community, which is on a track to account for more than half the population by midcentury.

"Russia is going through a religious transformation that will be of even greater consequence for the international community than the collapse of the Soviet Union," said Paul Goble, a specialist on Islam in Russia and research associate at the University of Tartu in Estonia.

Russia's overall population is dropping at a rate of 700,000 people a year, largely because of the short life spans and low birthrates of ethnic Russians. According to the CIA World Factbook, the national fertility rate is 1.28 children per woman, far below what is needed to maintain the country's population of nearly 143 million. The rate in Moscow is even lower, at 1.1 children per woman.

Russia's Muslims, however, are bucking that trend. The fertility rate for Tatars living in Moscow is six children per woman, Mr. Goble said, while the Chechen and Ingush communities are averaging 10 children per woman. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of Muslims from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan have been flocking to Russia in search of work.

As if a nuclear Iran isn't scary enough -- a nuclear, Muslim Russia with ICBMs still targeted at South Dakota would make us all pine for the days of Vladimir Putin.

I've been putting off getting Mark Steyn's new book America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It.  Pat Buchanan's book The Death of the West stares at me from my bookshelf; I'm passing on a second reading.  And there are other tomes of doom out there.

The prescription is simple:
Get faith.
Get married.
Have babies.
Stay married.
Stay faithful.

Sorry if that's too cro-magnon, but absent that, nothing will save us -- not precision-guided weapons, not sensitivity training, not bio fuels.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Know Who You Are

I was recently in the El Paso County Sheriff's Office.  I happened to notice a paper posted on a bulletin board.  The paper showed the number of the Colorado statute covering the fingerprinting of sex offenders.  Made sense.

On the same board was a second paper showing the number of the Colorado statute covering the fingerprinting of concealed firearm permit holders.  Hmmm.

And finally, there was a third paper showing the number of the Colorado statute covering the fingerprinting of liquor licensees.  I was beginning to see a trend.

I joked with the clerk that maybe the next group that will be fingerprinted will be day care providers.

She thought that was a good idea.

Her rationale: who knows who these people are that watch other people's kids?

I decided not to make jokes any more in the Sheriff's Office.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Narrative Continues

A few days ago, an article in USA Today compared the monthly cost of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan to the monthly cost of which war from history:

a.) Civil War
b.) World War II
c.) Korean War
d.) Vietnam War

Of course, you already know the answer.

Answer #1: the WSJ Opinion Journal made a pre-emtive strike on that line of reasoning back in October:

It's true that overall defense outlays for fiscal year 2007 are on track to surpass--in dollars adjusted for inflation--defense spending at the height of the Vietnam War. It's also true that defense spending has already increased by some 40% since 2001, when President Bush came to office. War opponents cite such figures to suggest that the Iraq campaign is too great a burden, and is sucking up funds better spent on domestic programs.

Less talked about is that the $528 billion spent on national defense in fiscal 2006, which ended on September 30, equaled only 4% of U.S. gross domestic product. Historically, that level is far more in line with peacetime military spending. Many Americans might be surprised to learn that current U.S. defense spending isn't all that much above the 3% share of GDP that prevailed from 1999-2001 and was a postwar World War II low.

Answer #2: according to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, the primary purpose of the federal government is to defend the country, not hand out free drugs to old people.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erec tion of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Darfur

According to FoxNews/AP, Sudanese government extermination of people in Darfur continues:

Spiraling violence in the conflict-wracked region of western Sudan is reaching its worst level since fighting erupted more than three years ago, Jan Egeland, the U.N. undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs said.

"The government and its militias are conducting inexplicable terror against civilians," he said in an Associated Press interview just after returning from his final trip to the area before his term as U.N. humanitarian chief ends in December.

"The government is arming Arab militias more than ever before ... the angst is that we may be reverting to the same level of violence" as in 2003, he said.

More than 200,000 people have died and 2.5 million have been forced to flee their homes since fighting broke out after ethnic Africa tribes rebelled against the Arab-led government. Janjaweed, Arab militias supported by the government, are believed to be responsible for many of the atrocities.

Sudan is in the same boat as was Rwanda.  Neither country is strategically important to any country that has the capacity to do something about it.  So the "problem" has been handed off to the U.N.;  Joseph LaConte detailed the U.N.'s inaction in the National Review back in September.

“Appeals to Khartoum’s conscience, and requests for its assistance in winding back its ethnic cleansing campaign, are destined to fail,” writes Nick Grono, vice president of the International Crisis Group. “The regime will only change its behavior in response to realistic threats to punishment.” So far the United Nations has failed to muster any such threats in the face of the most grievous human-rights disaster since the Rwanda genocide.

All this comes despite the U.N.’s new “responsibility to protect” doctrine. Under the doctrine, approved unanimously by the General Assembly last year, member states agree that they have an obligation to protect people from genocide and other atrocities. States that fail to protect their own citizens, the doctrine implies, can’t escape international censure or even military action. Yet U.N. officials do not contemplate the deployment of troops in Sudan without permission from the offending regime. Suggestions that a NATO-led force establish safe havens for refugees — with or without U.N. Security Council approval — have gone nowhere.

Then what is left?  Do we sit and watch as this goes on, and then when it's over say, "never again," yet again?  But on the other hand, we can't send U.S. troops into every conflict hither and yon.  And the Iranian threat looms.

So let us send supplies, arms, and some military advisors to the rebels.  We can do that.  We can do what Ronald Reagan did for Latin America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Milton Friedman, RIP

Milton Friedman, the great free-market economist, has passed away at the ripe age of 94.

Here's a sample of his work:

Many discussions of the economic effect of tax cuts and deficits implicitly assume that government spending is predetermined and independent of whether there is a tax cut or a deficit. In that world, deficits are produced entirely by a shortage of tax receipts. Raising taxes can eliminate the deficit without affecting spending. As I see the world, the situation is very different. What is predetermined is not spending but the politically tolerable deficit. Raise taxes by enough to eliminate the existing deficit and spending will go up to restore the tolerable deficit. Tax cuts may initially raise the deficit above the politically tolerable deficit, but their longer-term effect will be to restrain spending.

He deserves a greater tribute than I am able to give.  He will be missed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Face of Reform

And so, to rejuvinate the Republicans on Capitol Hill and lead them forward from the wilderness, the choice for Senate Minority Whip is...

(drum roll)

Trent Lott.

(silence from the audience, followed by a few folks politely, yet half-heartedly clapping)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's Missing from this List?

According to the Seattle PI/AP, Bill Gates is noodling on how the U.S. education system can be improved:

Specifically, he said the U.S. education system needs higher standards, clear accountability, flexible personnel practices, and innovation.

I would think one of the world's most competitive capitalists would have mentioned "choice" or "competition."

"Real accountability means more than having goals; it also means having clear consequences for not meeting the goals," he said in a speech earlier Monday to Washington educators who came to hear the results of an education task force.

Does everyone who goes to Washington turn foggy along the way?  Accountability doesn't happen because some bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. monitors the performance of an elementary school in Seattle; real accountability happens when your customers walk away and choose another provider.  The article notes that Bill's children go to (surprise, surprise) private school.  Apparently Bill and Melinda, as parents, exercised their choices.  Here's a wacky thought: allocate a few $million from the Foundation to provide scholarships to low income kids to create choices for them.  Or for real fun, do it for an entire school district of children.  Then you'll see reform.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Survival of the Fittest

Patrick Hoeffel of Colorado Springs sends me this note:

If the Education establishment is so deeply committed to the principle of Natural Selection, then let them demonstrate it by supporting School Choice initiatives in every state.  The fittest schools will survive, and the fittest school models will reproduce and perpetuate themselves. 

Charles Darwin wrote, "In the struggle for survival, the fittest win out at the expense of their rivals because they succeed in adapting themselves best to their environment."

I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bluster

According to FoxNews/AP, Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, the new leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq has issued an audio tape:
"We will not rest from our Jihad until we are under the olive trees of Rumieh and we have destroyed the dirty black house -- which is called the White House," al-Muhajir said.

Describing George W. Bush as "the most stupid president" in U.S. history, the Al Qaeda leader reached out to the Muslim world and said his group was winning faster than expected in Iraq.

"We call the lame duck (Bush) not to hurry up in escaping the same way the defense minister did," he said, referring to the removal of Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary following the Democrats' victory in Midterm elections.

"They are getting ready to leave, because they are no longer capable of staying"

"Remain steadfast in the battlefield you coward," he called on the U.S president.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, you got what you wanted: the Congress.  Now it's time to help the President go after our enemies.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »